Rupert Sheldrake: Telephone Telepathy
Tuesday, December 18th, 2007 at
9:10 am
nautis asked:
The renowned biologist Rupert Sheldrake presents his recent findings, powerfully suggesting Buy Viagra Online Without Prescription that part of us extends beyond our bod The renowned biologist Rupert Sheldrake presents his recent findings, powerfully suggesting that part of us extends beyond our bodies to make direct connection with the world around us. The presentation includes a video (filmed for television) showing the Nolan sisters.
There are four possible sisters that can call, that gives a probability of 1/4 of guessing correctly due to chance.
20 calls isn’t going to make a statistically significant result, however he’s repeated this experiment thousands of times with significant results.
Yes your right about that. Maybe I got it from 5:01 where only 3 sisters enters the room.
Still you’ve got to have long test runs to prove anything statistically. Small test series like 10-30 tries can vary a lot from what’s statistically expected.
5 sisters, 1 guesser, 4 left. Thats 0,25, not 0,33.
Statistically it should be 33% (1 out of 3) not 25%. The number of tries was way to short to be able to see any trend. They didn’t say beforehand how many tries there there was going to be so the test leader could just stop when he was high enough to prove his point.
Telephone telepathy sounds credible since we often get a sense we know who’s calling. But on an normal day we mostly get calls from persons we know and the guesswork is not that difficult.
The secret is to speak to them but in your mind before making the phone call – I assure you this is one of the effective and powerful psychic technique – speak to your target in or with your mind oinly then observe the outcome.
Depends on her preferences…
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
very interesting, thanks for sharing. i agree, 50% correct compels further investigation. skeptical comments seem to ignore statistical significance…now why is that? i thought skeptics loved stats as a primo debunker tool? hmm…only when it suits huh?
Its alittle depressing how dumb some people are. this hasnt been “debunked” And it doesnt need “controls” when you know the expected occurrence in the general population. try to not be retarded if you can
well i guess having faith that this actually is possible and that our minds have a chance to accomplish this doesn’t do any harm….i mean other than being human monkeys working for jobs that we **** so we can buy **** that we don’t need
This has already been debunked by two scientists in France. It has to do with mathematical probability not with magic as this “scientist” claims. He’s a disgrace to the scientific method.
Did they check if certain people call more often?
And over all of them, it should be 25% but it’s not, it’s 40%, that was the point of the whole video.
Interesting.
Well sir, you have proven you know very little of 3rd grade mathematics.
Susie has 4 fruits, an apple, an orange, a banana, and a pear. If she picks one up, what are the chances it will be a pear?
Maybe they are skipping it and throw the die again.
Of course, a skeptic would just say a name without asking his subconscious mind who can be calling him.
It’s average, not absolute 25%! Some can guess 100% and some 0%, but in average is somewhere near 25% and when this average score is much higher than 25% people are considering that something is influencing the results. In this case the idea is clairvoyance.
To be more clear, this so called “baseline” that you’re seeking does not exist. Nothing is that absolute, even the word “basic” and “chance”.
bs! If the average score of 1000 trails is 42% it’s almost impossible to be just by chance.
Nice try!
Sheldrake states in:
Rupert Sheldrake – The Extended Mind – Telepathy. Pt 2/3
That the average score in these tests is 42%.
And he states further that this is:
way, way above chance.
Okay, here’s the scoop. The FINAL 2 SENTENCES SPOKEN are: “Colleen’s final score is 50%. One of the highest of over 1000 tests done by Dr. Sheldrake.” So, this again is based on “chance” and nothing more! Do 1000 tests of a 1 in 4 experiment, and 1 test out of 1000 will (by chance odds alone) be 50% accurate, while another will (by chance odds alone) be 0% accurate! those are the ODDS folks, nothing paranormal about it!
Obje’k't
I dont see where i did use “k” insdead of “c” thoguh, but well, that could happend, we almost never uses the letter c when I think about it.
It seems in Norwegian (sometimes) ‘k’ is used instead ‘c’ when compared to English.
I thought that is the case in German.
In this show that runs in norway about finding the person in norway that is most clairvoyance, they had a test with telepathy. One lady was standing a diffrent building then the clairvoyance people. She had 4 diffrents coulur pens and 8 diffret objekt that she could draw. She draw 5 difrrent objekts and she could choose wich colour she could use. And one of the clairvoyance guy did draw the 5 objekts exactly the same way as the ladie did draw, even the colour! whats the odds of that?